➯ A Typical Incendiary Blog Post
The first paragraph:
This sentence contains a provocative statement that attracts the readers’ attention, but really only has very little to do with the topic of the blog post. This sentence claims to follow logically from the first sentence, though the connection is actually rather tenuous. This sentence claims that very few people are willing to admit the obvious inference of the last two sentences, with an implication that the reader is not one of those very few people. This sentence expresses the unwillingness of the writer to be silenced despite going against the popular wisdom. This sentence is a sort of drum roll, preparing the reader for the shocking truth to be contained in the next sentence.
And so it goes. Don’t skip the comments on this one!
Via Kottke
Link ➯ Sunday, February 7, 2010, 9:44 PM
➯ A Story Culture
[…] I think what you’re saying is, “I don’t think that anyone will find anything of value in my thought,” and you’re wrong. You’ve got two things going for you. You’ve got the inexplicable moment of inspiration that created your idea, and it’s the closest thing to magic you’ll experience in your life. Second, you’ve got the entire planet listening and there’s just no telling what any of those folks are looking for.
The value of the idea is one part that it is yours and one part that you gave it to someone else. It’s you and something new.
Seriously, are you subscribed to Rands’ feed yet?
Link ➯ Sunday, February 7, 2010, 9:39 PM
➯ Who Will Save Us?
If by save you mean, “who will keep the jobs of the pressmen and the delivery guys and the squadrons of accountants and box makers and transshippers and bookstore buyers and assistant editors and coffee boys,” then the answer is still nothing will. Not the Kindle, not the iPad, not an act of Congress.
We need to get past this idea of saving, because the status quo is leaving the building, and quickly. Not just in print of course, but in your industry too.
So many people are concerned with preserving what they have now that they never stop to question the value of what it is they’re trying to preserve.
Via Fraser Speirs
Link ➯ Tuesday, February 2, 2010, 11:28 AM
➯ OmniGraffle on iPad
We started working on iPad adaptations of OmniGraffle and OmniFocus as soon as the SDK was made available Wednesday afternoon, and we’re hoping to get started with OmniGraphSketcher for iPad within the next few weeks.
Squee!
Link ➯ Saturday, January 30, 2010, 6:14 PM
➯ Fraser Speirs on the iPad
If you only read two blog posts or articles about the iPad, make this the second one.
Link ➯ Friday, January 29, 2010, 1:49 PM
➯ Stephen Frank on the iPad
If you read only one blog entry or article about the iPad, make it this one.
Link ➯ Friday, January 29, 2010, 12:32 PM
➯ Ashley Linnenbank's Take on Milk Packaging
I wish there was more whimsy like this surrounding me when I walk down the isle of a grocery store.
Link ➯ Friday, January 29, 2010, 12:20 PM
➯ NASA's Budget
In a just-completed study, we asked respondents what percentage of the national budget is allocated to NASA and to the Department of Defense, the Department of Education, the Department of Agriculture, and the Department of Health and Human Services, among other agencies. NASA’s allocation, on average, was estimated [by participants] to be approximately 24% of the national budget (the NASA allocation in 2007 was approximately 0.58% of the budget.)
Few topics are able to stir such rage and despair in me as the ridiculously tiny amount of resources we, as a species, contribute to space exploration, but the sheer amount of ignorance surrounding this issue is one of them.
Via Neven Mrgan
Link ➯ Thursday, January 28, 2010, 11:50 PM
➯ Kiwi!
Dony Permedi’s Master’s Thesis animation almost made me cry.
Almost.
…
*Wipes a tear away.*
If you want to know more ISFAT interviewed Dony about the piece.
Link ➯ Thursday, January 28, 2010, 3:20 PM
✎ Initial iPad Impressions
In no particular order…
- “iPad?” Seriously? Wow. Okay.
- The home screen is the very definition of wasted potential. I don’t get it: the home/lock screen on the current devices already leaves a lot to be desired, so on this “magical” new device they simply add more spacing between icons? The fuck? It’s not like there hasn’t been great work done in this area already, and Apple certainly has no qualms about borrowing ideas.
- I can’t believe there’s no camera, front or back. And iChat wasn’t anywhere to be found, either!
- The lack of multitasking is infuriating. I really expected a slick, intuitive implementation here that didn’t involve window management. Something like those fancy popup panels from the status bar at the top, but for different apps running in the back. Tap on one, you get music playback controls from the iPod/Pandora/etc. app. Tap on another, you get a little tabbed chat interface. Tap on another, there’s basically the iPhone version of Tweetie floating there for you. All without exiting the app you’re currently in. They could throb gently when they had something new for you to look at. But no.
- $499? And the top-of-the-line model is less than $900? Awesome! Glad I was totally wrong!
- There are several metric tons of potential here for third-party developers, even with the limitations mentioned above.
- Bluetooth keyboard support. Finally.
- VGA out via a special dock cable is surprising but very welcome.
- iWork is surprising but very welcome.
- The reported speed (fast, fast, fast) is surprising but very welcome.
Still not sure if I’ll get one.
(I’m totally going to get one.)
Text ✎ Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 11:31 PM
↺ Older Page 1 of 15
